Back to Basics: 10 Common Mistakes
and How to Avoid Them
By Terry and Jim Willard
Alfred Sheinwold, a famous author of books on playing bridge, once wrote:
"Learn all you can from the mistakes of others. You won't have time
to make them all yourself."
The same holds true in genealogy. In our twenty-five years of teaching
genealogy and conducting workshops, we have seen just about every type
of mistake that beginning genealogists, and even some more advanced genealogists,
But by reviewing a few simple suggestions and our countdown of ten common
research mistakes, you, and all genealogists, may be able to avoid these
pitfalls. Remember, while learning from your own mistakes may be a wonderful
way to learn, learning from the mistakes of others is far less painful.
Failing to record information on standard genealogical
Regardless of the nature of the information you discover, always enter
it onto a standard genealogical form. The purpose of these forms is to
keep you organized. Many beginning genealogists write down information
on napkins, scraps of paper, or the backs of envelopes, and then fail
to transfer the information to its proper place on a standard form or
software program. Standardized forms also provide something for others
to work with after you have passed your research on to them. But remember,
whether it is a five-generation pedigree chart, a family group record,
or any other standard research form, these forms are only roadmaps to
future research and not the finished project.
Ignoring the siblings of the ancestors you are researching
Once beginners start using a five-generation chart for their data entry,
many become too reliant on the form and overlook the collateral lines.
In approaching research, these individuals can provide valuable clues.
When researching a census, for example, you might find the parents of
an ancestor living with one of their other children. Not only will this
provide you with the names of the parents, it also places the parents
in a location that can then lead to additional information.
Researching collateral lines may also lead to a previously unknown relative
who is also doing research on the family. These distant cousins can often
provide the big break you've been hoping for.
Overlooking the maiden names of female ancestors
Many beginners simply forget to record a female's maiden or birth name
in their research. It may be easy to think of our female ancestors and
relatives by their married names, enter the information accordingly, and
then ignore that entire line. Even if you are not including female lines
in your project, you should still record the maiden names. This might
provide a valuable clue for future research since some families use the
mother's maiden name as a middle name for the oldest male child. This
information could help identify the correct male ancestor when there are
two or more candidates in the same place and time.
Assuming you are related to a famous person who
shares the same surname
It is tempting for people with a family name like Boone or Crockett or
Lincoln to assume they are related to the famous person commonly associated
with that name. Then, based upon that assumption, they begin their research
from that point, trying to work from the famous person to themselves.
This is not a good research approach. Remember to start with yourself,
work backward in time, prove the connection between each generation, and
record where the information was found. Then, if you prove the connection
to that famous person, you'll really have something to brag about.
Skipping a generation
In many families it is common for three or more generations of male ancestors
to have the same name. A situation like this can lead the beginner to
list a male as the father when he is really the grandfather. In such cases
it is very easy to skip a generation. To avoid making this mistake, be
careful to gather as many dates as possible and evaluate carefully the
facts that are uncovered, such as dates and place names.
Assuming a family name is only spelled one way
Beginners often have the notion that their names have always been spelled
a particular way through the generations. In our own research we have
seen the Willard name spelled several different ways: Willard, Wellard,
Williard, Wilard, Wylerde, even Wilardo. If we are searching alphabetically
through an index seeking this family name, we have learned to check each
of these variations since information can be listed where we least expect
it. One of the best exercises for beginning geologists is to spell the
name being researched as many different ways as possible (phonetically).
While searching all the variations of a family name can add extra time
to research, the results will often make it all worthwhile.
Jumping to conclusions based on insufficient evidence
Genealogy is all about proof. If you approach your research correctly,
you should start with yourself and work backward, one generation at a
time. The key to success is to prove conclusively the link between the
generations. Like any good detective, you must gather the evidence, evaluate
the evidence in context, and reach a conclusion based upon corroborating
evidence. Reaching a conclusion based upon incomplete evidence can jeopardize
the case. It may be easiest to develop a "working theory" first.
When you are uncertain of a relationship‚Äîe.g., husband/wife,
parent/child, sibling/sibling‚Äîform a theory or hypothesis
first. But remember, no conclusion should be reached until proof is found
to substantiate the theory.
Researching the wrong family
Here, a researcher quickly accepts the incorrect assumption of a relationship
between two people and continues his or her research from there. We have
seen examples where as many as ten generations of research have been done
and done well‚Äîbut it was done on the wrong family line.
That is a considerable amount of time and energy spent researching someone
else's family tree. Suggestion: do not proceed to the next generation
of research unless you have concrete proof of a link between those generations.
Relying on online data found in a family tree
While the Internet has been a fantastic aid to genealogical research by
bringing billions of names to the fingertips of computer-savvy researchers,
it has the potential to be a source of mis-information as well. Because
of its reach, even just a little bit of incorrect information posted on
an accessible website can quickly infect a number of research projects.
While plenty of quality Internet sources exist for the genealogical researcher,
it is always best to approach any unfamiliar source with a healthy dose
of skepticism. Remember, just because the information is found on the
Internet does not make it accurate.
Failing to document your sources
The single greatest error in genealogical research is failing to document
where you found your information. Our own individual research is not an
end in itself, it is part of a much larger body of information. At some
point our research will become part of an enormous database (if it hasn't
already). Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of others will easily access our
data in the decades ahead. We owe it to them to be accurate in our research
and to document where we found our information so we don't proliferate
Terry and Jim Willard hosted the ten-part PBS Ancestors series. They have
researched their family history fifteen generations back on both sides
GOTO: Essential Books
RETURN TO GENEALOGY